Metal implant removal: benefits and drawbacks – a patient survey
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Hardware removals are among the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. Current literature offers little data concerning postoperative patient satisfaction. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the patients' point of view on implant removal. METHODS We surveyed patients of a German level one trauma center, who underwent hardware removal in 2009 and 2010, with regard to their personal experiences on implant removal. Exclusively, data obtained out of the survey were analyzed. RESULTS In 332 patients surveyed, most hardware removals were performed at the ankle joint (21%) followed by the wrist (15%). The most frequent indication was a doctor's recommendation (68%), followed by pain (31%) and impaired function (31%). Patient reported complication rate of implant removal was 10%. Importantly, after implant removal because of pain or impaired function patients reported an improvement in function (72%) as well as decreased pain (96%). 96% of all responding patients and 66% of the patients who suffered from subsequent complications would opt for surgical implant removal again. CONCLUSION In summary, despite the challenging and frequently troublesome nature of surgical hardware removal our data contradicts the widely held view that implant removal is often without a positive effect on the patients. These findings may influence the surgeons' attitude towards implant removal and their day-to-day routine in patient counseling.
منابع مشابه
Surgeons' beliefs and perceptions about removal of orthopaedic implants
BACKGROUND The routine removal of orthopaedic fixation devices after fracture healing remains an issue of debate. There are no evidence-based guidelines on this matter, and little is known on surgeons' practice and perceived effectiveness of implant removal in different clinical settings. METHODS A 41-item questionnaire was distributed to 730 attendees of the AO Principles and Masters Courses...
متن کاملOutcome Assessment after Aptis Distal Radioulnar Joint (DRUJ) Implant Arthroplasty
Background: Conventional treatments after complicated injuries of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) such as Darrach and Kapandji-Sauvé procedures have many drawbacks, which may eventually lead to a painful unstable distal ulna. The development of DRUJ prosthesis has significantly evolved over the past years. In this study, we assessed the outcome results of patients after DRUJ implant arthro...
متن کاملHardware removal: indications and expectations.
Although hardware removal is commonly done, it should not be considered a routine procedure. The decision to remove hardware has significant economic implications, including the costs of the procedure as well as possible work time lost for postoperative recovery. The clinical indications for implant removal are not well established. There are few definitive data to guide whether implant removal...
متن کاملبررسی نتایج خارج سازی ایمپلنت در بیماران مراجعه کننده به بیمارستان شهید صدوقی یزد از اردیبهشت ماه 1389 لغایت خرداد ماه1394
Introdution: Nowadays, the use of internal fixation in the field of orthopedics is increasing. On the other hand, there is no clear criteria at hand on removal of orthopedic implants, and there is disagreement among orthopedic surgeons on the necessity of routine removal of orthopedic implants in all patients after the healing of the fracture, and many surgeons take a personal approach towards ...
متن کاملImplant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey
BACKGROUND The aim of this survey study was to evaluate the current opinion and practice of trauma and orthopaedic surgeons in the Netherlands in the removal of implants after fracture healing. METHODS A web-based questionnaire consisting of 44 items was sent to all active members of the Dutch Trauma Society and Dutch Orthopaedic Trauma Society to determine their habits and opinions about imp...
متن کامل